Reasons why I can't bring myself to vote for Barack Obama:
1. Lying about his intent to use public financing in the general election. To me, this is huge. It makes me feel like, before he even gets into office, I can't really trust promises he makes. Could John McCain have gotten away with something like that, without raising all sorts of questions about his character and trustworthiness? More to the point, I feel like it sets a really dangerous precedent. From now on, I think that we probably won't see candidates accept public financing for a general presidential election. Even if Barack really is the squeaky-clean god-man we all hope he is, that's not to say that the next guy will be. Now that it is no longer taboo to privately finance a campaign, I think we've opened the door for a LOT of ugliness and corruption. Oh yeah and visiting Obama's website and being forced to figure out how to navigate past the "Donate Money!" greeting page was a real turn-off, too. I feel like that probably takes advantage of folks.
2. Social Security. I think that Social Security will ultimately become no longer viable (probably sooner rather than later). There will be too few people making contributions that are too small in order to benefit too many retirees. To me, vowing to keep Social Security in place, at any cost, as he has done is little more than a pledge to keep us all more or less throwing away money. People who contribute to Social Security now will likely never see returns on those contributions, or at least not returns that are proportional to the contributions. I agree that it is necessary for the government to ensure that its citizens have some kind of "safety net" and so I can see how Obama's rhetoric about preserving the system is comforting. However, I don't think that Social Security is the answer.
Better, to me, that the Federal Government privatize Social Security so that I can provide for myself in my old age - instead of relying on others, or on a system that no longer works. Meanwhile, I'd be contributing at the state level to programs that would support my fellow residents and whose effects I could observe on a daily basis.
3. Health Care. Obama's health care plan might lower everyone's cost of health care, but what is it going to do for the quality of care? Socializing the health system at the federal level seems like a bad idea just because it would, again, decrease competition among health providers and insurance companies and lower the quality of care for everyone involved. How long does it take to get a medical appointment or treatment for a serious condition in France? In Canada? Why would we be any different?
I think that there is a lot that can be done at the state level to establish low-cost clinics for low-income families - some kind of "no insurance required / small fee-for-service" place to obtain medicine and treatment. For longer term illnesses, I could see states establishing some kind of fund for those same families. I think that doing so would be more cost-effective than creating explicit health-care insurance programs for every person - AND it would take away a lot of control from insurance companies, which is something we all want. Moreover, having the states take more responsibility for providing health services for residents would again raise the bar of competition among states. States would be more compelled to grow stronger economies and implement more initiatives to attract growth and development.
I think that if we take measures to make our states more responsible, stronger, and more competitive, we will have a much stronger country, on the whole. I feel like Barack Obama wants a lot of good things for everyone - which is good - but I feel like having the Federal Government take on the sorts of responsibilities that he wants it to will untimately, unfortunately, inhibit many of the good things that we all want to see happen in the country. Not only that, they might inhibit any future potential for those opportunities on the state level - how would we come back from that, and roll back the Fedearal Government's power to give the states a fighting chance?
He's dashing, articulate, and inspiring. But, I just can't do it.
2 comments:
my roommate says the best example as to why socialized healthcare is not the best is tricare. lol
~vicky
lol Vicky. That's true.
But commenting on your post JP, I am def. against universal healthcare based off what I have seen being in Europe and what I have heard about what happened to other friends in Europe when they were sick/injured. When I was in Spain, my friend fell down some stairs and hurt her ankle and when they took her to the doctor, they never x-rayed it. In the US, that's the first thing they would have done. But there they just told her to take some medicine and ice it and that it would be fine by monday. Right. When she got back she actually had to wear a boot on her foot for at least 3 months because it had been injured that badly and if they had x-rayed it they would've known. Then when 3 of my other friends were in Italy, one of them got really sick (she had at least had mono and strep throat, among other things) and they were actually turned away from hospitals because they were closed or the employees didn't feel like helping her. Ridiculous.
Post a Comment